<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  	<channel>
		<ttl>10</ttl>
    	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005-2009 Sunstein, Kann, Murphy &amp; Timbers LLP, All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
    	<language>en-us</language>
    	<title>Sunstein IP Update</title>
    	<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/</link>
    	<description>Our Firm's Newsletters</description>
		<docs>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/newsletter.html</docs>
      	<generator>TextMate 1.5.8</generator>
      	<managingEditor>no-reply@sunsteinlaw.com</managingEditor>
      	<webMaster>no-replyr@sunsteinlaw.com</webMaster>


		
		!-- September 2010 -->

		 <item>
			<title>The Federal Circuit Hems in the Patent Misuse Doctrine, Making Patent Pooling Safer </title>
			<author>tcarey@sunsteinlaw.com (Thomas C. Carey)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/09/Carey_201009.html</link>
			<description>Companies that participate in patent pools will not ordinarily be tagged for anticompetitive use of their patents. </description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sept 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Updated Guidelines on What Is "Obvious" Reflect an Updated PTO  </title>
			<author>bsunstein@sunsteinlaw.com (Bruce D. Sunstein)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/09/Sunstein_201009.html</link>
			<description>Examiners at the PTO follow new, patent-friendlier guidelines for determining the obviousness of an invention. </description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sept 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Software Makers, Take Note: Court Defines "Circumvention" Downward </title>
			<author>ktimbers@sunsteinlaw.com (Kerry L. Timbers)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/09/Timbers_201009.html</link>
			<description>Hacking a security device in order to use a software program may not violate copyright law after all. </description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sept 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>	
			
		<item>
			<title>When is a Sale Not a Sale? When a Software License Says So </title>
			<author>mainbinder@sunsteinlaw.com (Meredith L. Ainbinder)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/09/Ainbinder_201009.html</link>
			<description>In a reversal regarding the first-sale doctrine, court says a software license can bar user from reselling the program. </description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sept 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>	

		<item>
			<title>Copyright Decision Deals Crippling Blow to Infringer: Decorative Furniture Not Merely Functional </title>
			<author>ltittemore@sunsteinlaw.com (Lisa M. Tittemore)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/09/Tittemore_201009.html</link>
			<description>Copyright law protects the non-utilitarian design elements of furniture against knockoffs. </description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sept 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>					


		!-- August 2010 -->

		 <item>
			<title>Bimbo Knows the Muffin Man . . . and Teaches Him a Lesson in Trade Secrets </title>
			<author>jleeman@sunsteinlaw.com (Joel Leeman)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/08/Leeman_201008.html</link>
			<description>A federal appeals court makes it a bit easier for companies to prevent employees privy to essential trade secrets from working for a competitor. </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>When Does an "Offer for Sale" Made in Another Country Result in Infringement of a U.S. Patent? </title>
			<author>tcarey@sunsteinlaw.com (Thomas C. Carey)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/08/RizzoSmith_201008.html</link>
			<description>Liability for offering to sell goods that infringe a U.S. patent depends not on where you make the offer, but on where the goods are meant to be used. </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Copyright Protection for Fashion Design:A Narrowly Tailored Proposal  </title>
			<author>nrizzosmith@sunsteinlaw.com (Nicole Rizzo Smith)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/07/Carey2_201007.html</link>
			<description>Fashion designers may soon enjoy copyright protection. A proposed law also accommodates the interests of imitators. </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>		

		

		!-- July 2010 -->

		 <item>
			<title>Who's Holding the Bag? When a Website Sells Infringing Articles, Credit Card Companies May Face Liability </title>
			<author>tcarey@sunsteinlaw.com (Thomas C. Carey)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/07/Carey_201007.html</link>
			<description>Sellers of counterfeit goods need buyers with credit cards. Influential court says providers of credit services can be liable for infringement by association. </description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 June 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Bratz Beats Barbie: Appeals Court Reverses Jury Verdict and Rejects Constructive Trust </title>
			<author>tcarey@sunsteinlaw.com (Thomas C. Carey)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/07/CareyBratz_201007.html</link>
			<description>Court rules that the idea for Bratz dolls, and the huge profits from their sale, do not clearly belong to Mattel. </description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 June 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Congress May Restore Copyright Protection to Public Domain Foreign Works Despite First Amendment Concerns  </title>
			<author>tcarey@sunsteinlaw.com (Thomas C. Carey)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/07/Carey2_201007.html</link>
			<description>Congress restored copyright protection to certain works by foreign artists. This does not offend the First Amendment, an appeals court holds. </description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 June 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>		

		<item>
			<title>The Federal Circuit Boots Another Patent Case Out of Texas, and Sends a Message </title>
			<author>edailey@sunsteinlaw.com (Edward Dailey)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/07/Dailey_201007.html</link>
			<description>As patent owners seek any pretext to sue in East Texas, Federal Circuit takes dim view of manufactured jurisdiction. </description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 June 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>		



		!-- June 2010 -->

		 <item>
			<title>Bilski v. Kappos: The Supreme Court Strikes a Blow for Inventors </title>
			<author>tcarey@sunsteinlaw.com (Thomas C. Carey)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/06/CareyBilski_201006.html</link>
			<description>Supreme Court dispels inventors' anxiety: Business methods may be eligible for patent protection, and test for patentability cannot be too rigid. </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 June 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Promises, Promises: Cutting Off Unwanted Patent Litigation With a Covenant Not to Sue  </title>
			<author>mainbinder@sunsteinlaw.com (Meredith Ainbinder)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/06/Ainbinder_201006.html</link>
			<description>A covenant not to sue can extricate a patent owner from a declaratory judgment lawsuit, but it's not an antidote for most cases. </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 June 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Solo Cup Puts The Lid On False Patent-Marking Case </title>
			<author>ttuytschaevers@sunsteinlaw.com (Thomas J. Tuytschaevers)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/06/Tuytschaevers_201006.html</link>
			<description>Falsely indicating that products are covered by a patent can incur heavy penalties, but would-be plaintiffs must prove a clear intent to deceive. </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 June 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>		

		<item>
			<title>Silence is Deadly: The Peril of Inaction After Calling Someone an Infringer </title>
			<author>jleeman@sunsteinlaw.com (Joel Leeman)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/06/Leeman_201006.html</link>
			<description>Fairness dictates that if you threaten someone with patent infringement, then dawdle before suing, you may forfeit your enforcement rights. </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 June 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>		



		!-- May 2010 -->

		 <item>
			<title>Nine Months Later: Colting Slips Away from The Catcher </title>
			<author>pkarol@sunsteinlaw.com (Peter Karol)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/05/Karol_201005.html</link>
			<description>To ban sales of a possibly infringing sequel to Catcher in the Rye, a solid showing of irreparable harm must be made. </description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Going Once, Going Twice: Tiffany Makes Another Bid to Restrict Auctions of Counterfeit Jewelry on eBay </title>
			<author>sabreu@sunsteinlaw.com (Steve Abreu)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/05/Abreu_201005.html</link>
			<description>Sales of counterfeit items do not expose eBay to trademark infringement when the wrong- doers are not known in advance. </description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Google Fends Off More Challengers to its Keyword Advertising </title>
			<author>lfleming@sunsteinlaw.com (Lisa Fleming)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/05/Fleming_201005.html</link>
			<description>European court hands Google another win over businesses aggrieved by keyword advertising. </description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>		

		<item>
			<title>Overzealous Trade-Secret Plaintiff Gets His Just Desserts </title>
			<author>jleeman@sunsteinlaw.com (Joel Leeman)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/05/Leeman_201005.html</link>
			<description>Owner of trade secret in source code cannot pin liability for misappropriation on customers of program that incorporate the code. </description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>		

		
		!-- April 2010 -->
		
		 <item>
			<title>Federal Judge Would Invalidate All DNA Patents, But His Rationale Is Controversial </title>
			<author>bsunstein@sunsteinlaw.com (Bruce D. Sunstein) &amp; jhuddleson@sunsteinlaw.com (Justin P. Huddleson)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/04/201004_JPH-BDSSpecialIssue.html</link>
			<description>Federal judge rules DNA patents invalid, stirring anxiety in biotech industry. </description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 April 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>


		!-- March 2010 -->

		 <item>
			<title>Federal Circuit Stamps Out Feud Between Postal Service and Sculptor </title>
			<author>nsmith@sunsteinlaw.com (Nicole Rizzo Smith)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/03/201003_RizzoSmith.html</link>
			<description>Copyright skirmish over postage stamp pushes the envelope on "fair use" doctrine. </description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 March 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Trying to Curb "Drive-By Jurisdictional Rulings": Supreme Court Clarifies Purpose of Registration Requirement in Copyright Cases </title>
			<author>mheyward@sunsteinlaw.com (Moses A. Heyward)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/03/201003_Heyward.html</link>
			<description>Supreme Court makes a fine distinction: Registration of copyright is a condition to infringement lawsuit, but not to subject-matter jurisdiction. </description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 March 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Museum Conflict Clarifies Rights of Artists </title>
			<author>ltittemore@sunsteinlaw.com (Lisa M. Tittemore)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/03/201003_Tittemore.html</link>
			<description>Massachusetts museum battle ends with a key ruling: Artist's right of integrity applies to unfinished works. </description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 March 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>		

		<item>
			<title>Can Ignorance Be a Defense? The Evolving Law of Inducement of Patent Infringement </title>
			<author>rkann@sunsteinlaw.com (Robert L. Kann)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/03/201003_Kann.html</link>
			<description>Deliberate indifference" to the existence of a competitor's patent can invite liability for inducing others to infringe that patent. </description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 March 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
			
		<item>
			<title>"Best Mode" of the Whole Invention Must Be Described </title>
			<author>tmurphy@sunsteinlaw.com (Timothy M. Murphy)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/03/201003_Murphy.html</link>
			<description>An inventor's failure to disclose the "best mode" for practicing his invention can result in the invalidity of his patent. </description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 March 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		
		!-- January 2010 -->
		
		 <item>
			<title>"Pay for Delay" Settlements: The FTC's 2010 Annual Report </title>
			<author>tcarey@sunsteinlaw.com (Thomas C. Carey)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/01/201001_Carey.html</link>
			<description>FTC alone decries payments for delaying introduction of generic drugs. </description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 January 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Has STARBUCKS Been Diluted? The Ongoing Effort to Protect Famous Marks  </title>
			<author>sabreu@sunsteinlaw.com (Steve Abreu)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/01/201001_Abreu.html</link>
			<description>Not funny enough: Seller of "Charbucks" coffee is liable for diluting a famous mark. </description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 January 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>The Penalty for False Patent-Marking Just Got Much Pricier </title>
			<author>ttuytschaevers@sunsteinlaw.com (Thomas J. Tuytschaevers)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/01/201001_Tuytschaevers.html</link>
			<description>Penalty for false patent-marking of goods has just increased. </description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 January 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Narrowing Patent Claims in Reissue: Hedging Your Bets Against Invalidity Is Not An Acceptable Objective </title>
			<author>jhuddleson@sunsteinlaw.com (Justin P. Huddleson)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/01/201001_Huddleson.html</link>
			<description>Reissue procedure is meant to correct mistakes in a patent, not to fortify it against validity attacks. </description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 January 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>		

		<item>
			<title>Federal Circuit Puts An End To PTO's Patent-Term Adjustment Follies </title>
			<author>kseluga@sunsteinlaw.com (Kimberly J. Seluga)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/01/201001_Seluga.html</link>
			<description>PTO must extend patent terms more generously where its own actions delayed approval of application. </description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 January 2010 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>		


		!-- December 2009 -->
		
		 <item>
			<title>Anything You Say Can Be Held Against You: Staying Out Of Court Just Got Harder for Patent Owners  </title>
			<author>mainbinder@sunsteinlaw.com (Meredith L. Ainbinder)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/12/200912_Ainbinder.html</link>
			<description>Threshold for declaratory judgment actions against patentees falls yet lower. </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 December 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Judge Urges - No, Implores -- Congress to Amend the Copyright Act: When Might Sharing Digital Music Be Fair Use?  </title>
			<author>ltittemore@sunsteinlaw.com (Lisa M. Tittemore)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/11/2009/12/200912_Tittemore2.html</link>
			<description>College student fails to prove that his music downloads are a "fair use" exception to the copyright laws. </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 December 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Apple Strikes Back Against the Clones: Injunction Stops Sale of Third-Party Computers Running Mac OS X  </title>
			<author>edailey@sunsteinlaw.com (Edward J. Dailey)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/12/200912_Dailey.html</link>
			<description>Cloner of Mac is held to infringe Apple's copyrights. Antitrust defenses are rejected. </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 December 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Patents on the Fringe </title>
			<author>spetuchowski@sunsteinlaw.com (Samuel J. Petuchowski)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/200912_Petuchowski.html</link>
			<description>Usefulness requirement prevents the patenting of inoperable inventions. </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 December 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		  <item>
			<title>"Ongoing Royalties" for Post-Verdict Patent Infringement </title>
			<author>ltittemore@sunsteinlaw.com (Lisa M. Tittemore)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/200912_Tittemore1.html</link>
			<description>Injunction out of reach? Patentees comfort themselves with "ongoing royalties. </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 December 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>


		!-- November 2009 -->
		
		 <item>
			<title>Google Book Project Tries to Placate the Critics: Will It Be Enough? </title>
			<author>tcarey@sunsteinlaw.com (Thomas C. Carey)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/11/200911_Carey.html</link>
			<description>Google Book Project adjusts its goals and policies in response to lawsuit and widespread criticism. </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 November 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Video Gamemaker's Unauthorized Use of Jim Brown's Likeness Protected by the First Amendment  </title>
			<author>jschecter@sunsteinlaw.com (Jack C. Schecter)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/11/200911_Schecter.html</link>
			<description>First Amendment bars football titan's challenge to use of his likeness in video game. </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 November 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Bilski on the Hot Seat: Supreme Court Holds Lively Hearing on Patentability of Business Methods  </title>
			<author>jconway@sunsteinlaw.com (John L. Conway)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/11/200911_Conway.html</link>
			<description>At oral argument, Supreme Court conveys skepticism on patentability of method inventions. </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 November 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Enhanced Interview Program Provides Greater Flexibility for Patent Applicants </title>
			<author>jklayman@sunsteinlaw.com (Jeffrey T. Klayman)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/200911_Klayman.html</link>
			<description>Patent office offers applicants early opportunity to interview examiners and iron out patentability issues. </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 November 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>


		!-- October 2009 -->
		
		 <item>
			<title>A Dubious Decision: First Sale Doctrine Does Not Extend to Copyrighted Works Made Overseas </title>
			<author>nrizzosmith@sunsteinlaw.com (Nicole Rizzo Smith)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/10/200910_Rizzo-Smith.html</link>
			<description>First-sale doctrine does not apply to copyrighted works made overseas and sold in the U.S. </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 October 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>When Uncle Sam Wants Your Invention </title>
			<author>sPetuchowski@sunsteinlaw.com (Samuel J. Petuchowski)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/10/200910_Petuchowski.html</link>
			<description>When a patent is infringed for the benefit of the U.S. government, the patent owner has limited remedies. </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 October 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>PTO Aims in a New Direction: Pulls Dreaded Prosecution Rules;Seeks Improved Quality of Its Services </title>
			<author>bsunstein@sunsteinlaw.com (Bruce D. Sunstein)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/10/200910_Sunstein.html</link>
			<description>PTO's new director rescinds unpopular prosecution rules and announces fresh initiatives to improve quality of examinations. </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 October 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>File No Patent Before Its Time: Test Results That Issue After Filing of Application Cannot Be Used to Meet Enablement Requirement </title>
			<author>jlovely@sunsteinlaw.com (Jonathan Lovely)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/10/200910_Lovely.html</link>
			<description>Test results published after date of patent application come too late to satisfy enablement requirement. </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 October 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Tax Treatment of Infringement Damages: Plan Ahead to Improve Your Results </title>
			<author>tcarey@sunsteinlaw.com (Thomas C. Carey)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/10/200910_Carey.html</link>
			<description>Do you want favorable tax treatment of your hoped-for litigation award?  Plan ahead.  </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 October 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		!-- September 2009 -->
		
		 <item>
			<title>Not So Drastic After All: Federal Circuit Softens Impact of Bilski on Medical Diagnostics </title>
			<author>jmichna@sunsteinlaw.com (Jakub Michna)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/09/200909_Michna.html</link>
			<description>Because it transforms human samples and the human body, a medical diagnostic test meets Bilski's machine-or-transformation standard for method patents. </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 September 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Federal Circuit Holds Litigants to Strict Evidentiary Standards in Proving Patent Infringement Damages </title>
			<author>ltittemore@sunsteinlaw.com (Lisa M. Tittemore)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/09/200909_Tittemore.html</link>
			<description>In reversing a $350m judgment against Microsoft, the Federal Circuit demands that parties support their damages calculations with solid market-based evidence. </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 September 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Bose Makes Waves in Federal Circuit Fraud Standards Redefined in Trademark Cases </title>
			<author>jhuston@sunsteinlaw.com (Julia Huston) kseluga@sunsteinlaw.com (Kimberly J. Seluga)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/09/200909_Huston-Seluga.html</link>
			<description>"Fraud on the PTO" will lead to fewer draconian losses of trademark registrations, now that the Federal Circuit holds that a knowing intent to deceive is the measure of fraud. </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 September 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>The FDA Approves an ANDA Despite An Appeals Court Stay, And Another Appeals Court Approves  </title>
			<author>tcarey@sunsteinlaw.com (Thomas C. Carey)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/09/200909_Carey.html</link>
			<description>When the FDA is free to approve a new generic drug despite ongoing litigation between pharma companies, the pioneer manufacturer faces a logistical bind. </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 September 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		<!-- August 2009 -->
		
		 <item>
			<title>Vague Allegations No Longer Acceptable When Asserting Inequitable Conduct Defense </title>
			<author>jstickevers@sunsteinlaw.com (John Stickevers)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/08/200908_Stickevers.html</link>
			<description>Attention accused patent infringers: Think twice before raising inequitable conduct defense. </description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 August 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>A Loophole Opens for Exporters of Devices Used to Perform Patented Methods </title>
			<author>rhess@sunsteinlaw.com (Robert Hess)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/08/200908_Hess.html</link>
			<description>Federal Circuit opens a loophole for practicing patented methods overseas. </description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 August 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>All Inventors Aboard on Your International Patent Application? Benefits of Early Filing Depend on Complete Ownership of Rights </title>
			<author>gjakobsche@sunsteinlaw.com (George Jakobsche)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/08/200908_Jakobsche.html</link>
			<description>With provisional applications, multiple inventors on one patent can complicate international protection. </description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 August 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Arrogance or Recklessness? Microsoft Faces a Hefty Judgment and a Permanent Injunction for Willful Infringement </title>
			<author>edailey@sunsteinlaw.com (Edward J. Dailey)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/08/200908_Dailey.html</link>
			<description>Microsoft's highhanded conduct in developing Word 2003 incurs punitive damages in patent suit.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 August 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<!-- July 2009 -->
		
		 <item>
			<title>Salinger "Sequel" Catches One in the Eye </title>
			<author>pkarol@sunsteinlaw.com (Peter Karol)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/07/200907_Karol.html</link>
			<description>JDid a judge's ban on publishing a sequel to The Catcher in the Rye offend the First Amendment? </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 July 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Pop the Champagne: Louis Roederer's Trademark Infringement Suit May Not Be Too Late After All </title>
			<author>gwilliamson@sunsteinlaw.com (Geoffrey Williamson)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/07/200907_Williamson.html</link>
			<description>The progressive encroachment doctrine lets trademark holders withhold suit until the likelihood of confusion "looms large." </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 July 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>The UPC Code: A New Frontier for Trademark Infringement? </title>
			<author>sabreu@sunsteinlaw.com (Steven A. Abreu)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/07/200907_Abreu.html</link>
			<description>Unauthorized removal of a UPC from a retail product may amount to trademark infringement. </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 July 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Polar Opposites: A High Tech Non-Compete Exposes Legal Conflict Between Massachusetts and California </title>
			<author>edailey@sunsteinlaw.com (Edward J. Dailey)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/07/200907_Dailey.html</link>
			<description>A Massachusetts employee cannot take advantage of California's prohibition on non-compete agreements.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 July 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Department of Justice Takes Aggressive View of "Pay for Delay" Settlements with Generic Drug Manufacturers </title>
			<author>tcarey@sunsteinlaw.com (Thomas Carey)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/07/200907_Carey.html</link>
			<description>The Dept. of Justice urges a harder line on "reverse payments" to generic drug makers. </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 July 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <!-- June 2009 -->
		
		 <item>
			<title>Adventure on the Appellation Trail: Joseph Abboud Gives Away His Name, Yet May Get to Use it Anyway </title>
			<author>jleeman@sunsteinlaw.com (Joel Leeman)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/06/200906_Leeman.html</link>
			<description>Joseph Abboud sells the "Joseph Abboud" trademark but might nevertheless be entitled to use his name in a new business venture.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 June 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Baseball Manager Sues Social Networking Site: Don't Twitter, Tweet, or Otherwise Cheat Me </title>
			<author>ltittemore@sunsteinlaw.com (Lisa M. Tittemore)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/06/200906_Tittemore.html</link>
			<description>Are social media responsible for their users' transgressions? Twitter's problem with impostors gets Tony LaRussa's goat.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 June 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Patent Avoids Ensnarement and Nets Millions </title>
			<author>ttuytschaevers@sunsteinlaw.com (Thomas J. Tuytschaevers)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/06/200906_Tuytschaevers.html</link>
			<description>In proving infringement under the doctrine of equivalents, don't overstretch the meaning of your patent, lest you be "ensnared" by the prior art.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 June 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Casting Doubt on Patent's Validity is Sound Strategy for Defeating Preliminary Injunction </title>
			<author>kseluga@sunsteinlaw.com (Kimberly Seluga)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/06/200906_Seluga.html</link>
			<description>Burden of proof placed on patent holders who seek preliminary injunctions will motivate accused infringers to mount early challenges to validity.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 June 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		 <item>
			<title>Court Offers Common Sense Standards for Challenging Plaintiffs' Choice of Venue  </title>
			<author>mainbinder@sunsteinlaw.com (Meredith L. Ainbinder)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/06/200906_Ainbinder.html</link>
			<description>How should judges decide requests to transfer venue? For one thing, consider the convenience of witnesses, says the Federal Circuit. </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 June 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Federal "Good Samaritan" Statute Protects Seller of Software That Blocks Adware and Spyware  </title>
			<author>tcarey@sunsteinlaw.com (Thomas Carey)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/06/200906_Carey.html</link>
			<description>In a boost for the Internet security industry, Sunstein wins "Good Samaritan" immunity for maker of anti-spyware products. </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 June 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		<!-- MAY 2009 -->

		<item>
			<title>Federal Circuit Finally Dispels Uncertainty Over the Scope of Product-By-Process Claims</title>
			<author>edailey@sunsteinlaw.com (Edward J. Dailey)</author>
			<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/05/200905_Dailey.html</link>
			<description>Court unsnarls long-standing conflict over scope of product-by-process patent claims.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

		<item>
	    	<title>Patent Pools May be Cool, But Drowning Competitive Technologies is Not</title>
			<author>tcarey@sunsteinlaw.com (Thomas C. Carey)</author>
	    	<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/05/200905_Carey2.html</link>
	    	<description>Patent pools can promote efficient licensing, but bundling potentially competing technologies in one license can attract antitrust scrutiny.</description>
	    	<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
	    	<title>Trade Show Exhibit Subjects Foreign Businessman to Federal Jurisdiction</title>
			<author>jleeman@sunsteinlaw.com (Joel R. Leeman)</author>
	    	<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/05/200905_Leeman.html</link>
	    	<description>Displaying wares at U.S. trade show can subject foreign corporation to personal jurisdiction in a patent-infringement lawsuit.</description>
	    	<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
	    	<title>Related Applications, Separately Owned, Create Double-Patenting Hazard</title>
			<author>bsunstein@sunsteinlaw.com (Bruce D. Sunstein)</author>
	    	<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/05/200905_Sunstein.html</link>
	    	<description>The Federal Circuit confines use of its two-way test for double patenting to applications that the PTO mistakenly approved out of sequence.</description>
	    	<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
	    	<title>Where Have I Seen THAT Before? Court Says Plagiarism Detector Makes Fair Use of Students' Copyrighted Term Papers</title>
			<author>spetuchowski@sunsteinlaw.com (Samuel J. Petuchowski, Ph.D.)</author>
	    	<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/05/200905_Petuchowski.html</link>
	    	<description>It's fair use: Plagiarism-detection website does not infringe students' copyrights.</description>
	    	<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
	    	<title>Other Pirates in the News: Copyright Infringers in Sweden Head for the Brig</title>
			<author>ltittemore@sunsteinlaw.com (Lisa M. Tittemore)</author>
	    	<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/05/200905_Tittemore.html</link>
	    	<description>"Crimes against copyright" - Swedish operators of file-sharing service get jail sentence.</description>
	    	<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
	    	<title>European Developments: Copyright Term Extended Trademark Rights Strengthened</title>
			<author>tcarey@sunsteinlaw.com (Thomas C. Carey)</author>
	    	<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/05/200905_Carey1.html</link>
	    	<description>European court says Dior is entitled to protect its trademark's "aura of luxury."</description>
	    	<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
	    	<title>European Developments: Copyright Term Extended Trademark Rights Strengthened</title>
			<author>tcarey@sunsteinlaw.com (Thomas C. Carey)</author>
	    	<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/05/200905_Carey1.html</link>
	    	<description>EU extends copyright term for musical performances.</description>
	    	<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<!-- APRIL 2009 -->
		
		<item>
	    	<title>Winds of Obviousness Blow Through Biotech Patents</title>
			<author>lmeyer-leon@sunsteinlaw.com (Leslie Meyer-Leon, Ph.D.)</author>
	    	<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com//publications-news/news-letters/2009/04/2009-04-Meyer-Leon.html</link>
	    	<description>Court holds that biotech patents, no less than those in other fields, can be invalidated on grounds of obviousness.</description>
	    	<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
	    	<title>Experimental Use - A Fragile Shield Against the One-Year Deadline for Filing Your Patent Application</title>
			<author>gjakobsche@sunsteinlaw.com (George J. Jakobsche)</author>
	    	<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com//publications-news/news-letters/2009/04/2009-04-Jakobsche1.html</link>
	    	<description>Although experimental use allows an inventor to push the deadline for patent application, reliance on this doctrine can be hazardous.</description>
	    	<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
	    	<title>Federal Judge: The Bell Tolls for Business Method Patents</title>
			<author>asmolenski@sunsteinlaw.com (Alexander J. Smolenski, Jr.)</author>
	    	<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com//publications-news/news-letters/2009/04/2009-04-Smolenski.html</link>
	    	<description>Judge says Bilski not only compels rejection of a software patent but threatens the validity of all business method patents.</description>
	    	<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
	    	<title>After Quanta, Lower Courts Expand the Patent Exhaustion Doctrine</title>
			<author>tcarey@sunsteinlaw.com (Thomas C. Carey) &amp; Yakov Sidorin</author>
	    	<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com//publications-news/news-letters/2009/04/2009-04-Sidorin-Carey.html</link>
	    	<description>Federal judges are expanding the "first sale" doctrine to defeat attempts by patent owners to limit the re-use or resale of their patented items.</description>
	    	<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
	    	<title>Patent Marking: The Other Edge of the Sword</title>
			<author>ttuytschaevers@sunsteinlaw.com (Thomas J. Tuytschaevers)</author>
	    	<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com//publications-news/news-letters/2009/04/2009-04-Tuytschaevers.html</link>
	    	<description>Marking your products as patented increases leverage against an infringer, but inaccurate marking can dangerously backfire.</description>
	    	<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
	    	<title>A First Amendment Right to Peter and the Wolf? Restoration of Copyright for Works of Foreign Authors in Doubt</title>
			<author>ltittemore@sunsteinlaw.com (Lisa M. Tittemore)</author>
	    	<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com//publications-news/news-letters/2009/04/2009-04-Tittemore.html</link>
	    	<description>Even to honor copyright treaty obligations, the U.S. may not abridge Americans' rights to use works in the public domain.</description>
	    	<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
	    	<title>Keyword Advertising: Small Victory for Trademark Owner Will Not Slow Search Engine Juggernaut</title>
			<author>edailey@sunsteinlaw.com (Edward J. Dailey)</author>
	    	<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com//publications-news/news-letters/2009/04/2009-04-Dailey.html</link>
	    	<description>Second Circuit allows trademark owner to press its "keyword advertising" suit against Google, but an ultimate victory on infringement is unlikely.</description>
	    	<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
	    	<title>Middle Earth, Not Middle Ground: Minnesota Weighs in on Insurance Coverage of Trademark Infringement</title>
			<author>tcarey@sunsteinlaw.com (Thomas C. Carey)</author>
	    	<link>http://www.sunsteinlaw.com//publications-news/news-letters/2009/04/2009-04-Carey.html</link>
	    	<description>Standard commercial liability insurance covers claims for trademark infringement, says Minnesota Supreme Court.</description>
	    	<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2009 09:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<pubDate>Fri, 4 June 2010 07:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 4 June 2010 07:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  	</channel>
</rss>
